For me, a good antagonist has to be smart or clever. Perhaps because I recently watched the Joan Collins documentary, Alexis Carrington came to mind. Having a sense of style or sass doesn't hurt. An ideal antagonist is fun to watch.
I don't know if a redemption is necessary, however I do think that a good antagonist has to have a chink in their armor. Someone who is just irredeemably evil is just dull. It might work for a movie where they can be disposable, but for a TV show they need some characterization if they're going to be more than the villain of the week.
Someone who is just irredeemably evil is just dull.
An antagonist doesn't have to be evil at all -- they just have to be at odds with the main character -- e.g. maybe the voice of reason if the protagonist being completely unreasonable, or an authority figure, etc. I mean, Marge Simpson is probably the antagonist in most episodes of The Simpsons.
Heh, that's true, though as I've been watching House of the Dragon lately it would be on my mind. I think a number of procedurals tend to include an "at odds" character, though very often they're defeated routinely which makes them a lot less memorable in my book.
no subject
I don't know if a redemption is necessary, however I do think that a good antagonist has to have a chink in their armor. Someone who is just irredeemably evil is just dull. It might work for a movie where they can be disposable, but for a TV show they need some characterization if they're going to be more than the villain of the week.
no subject
An antagonist doesn't have to be evil at all -- they just have to be at odds with the main character -- e.g. maybe the voice of reason if the protagonist being completely unreasonable, or an authority figure, etc. I mean, Marge Simpson is probably the antagonist in most episodes of The Simpsons.
no subject