yourlibrarian (
yourlibrarian) wrote in
tv_talk2024-03-19 11:57 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
TV Tuesday: The Real Life
What kind of TV documentaries do you watch? What do you think makes a good documentary?
Have you ever watched a documentary that was partially a re-enactment? Do you prefer those or do they put you off?
Have you ever watched a documentary that was partially a re-enactment? Do you prefer those or do they put you off?
no subject
As for what makes a good documentary... I want to learn something new about the subject. Most of the political/event-related docs that I watch are about subjects I already feel I know a fair bit about, so I want new information, new perspectives or insight into the topic, etc. I also like it if my preconceptions are challenged -- it forces me to think and rethink, and that's usually a good thing.
no subject
One thing I was reminded of (which I've now added into the post) is the trend of doing historical re-enactments for what are essentially history documentaries. It's this odd hybrid of scripted acting, interspersed with talking heads. (There's also a less elaborate form where there are simply re-enactments with voice overs of different actions or activities).
I have in my queue at Prime one of these about Charlemagne. I'm interested in seeing it but I tend to prefer either traditional or re-enactment docs vs the hybrid kind.
no subject
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt27541315/
no subject
no subject
historical stuff that reveals the background behind major events is extremely interesting - I'm always up for learning more
no subject
no subject
Sir David Attenborough... All other arguments are invalid. ;D
The only ones I really dislike as a category are the reenactment ones which are staged like they know exactly what a pharaoh's chief priest was thinking on his Tuesday's off. I want some evidence or at least the basis of their reasoning for it.
no subject
no subject
US ones generally don't work as well for me as ones from other countries, but I did very much enjoy PBS' Prehistoric Road Trip.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
When it comes to re-enactments, I'm normally not a big fan. I think they tend to be awkward or unnecessarily dramatic, without adding much in terms of understanding or entertainment. However, Screwball took things in a very fun direction: they had kid actors doing the scenes in place of adults. It really added a level of zaniness to an already wild story about sports doping.
I don't know what makes a good documentary for me exactly, but I know what makes a bad one: a nature doc that follows some little animals... which then get eaten. 🙈 If there's a David Attenborough doc that doesn't do that, send it my way, because I tried watching Planet Earth and it kept happening over and over again. I know it's the circle of life - heck, I'm not a vegan - but I get too attached to the prey to want to see any of their predators.
no subject
Re: the nature documentaries, I'm surprised it's the focus of the stories who get eaten. My partner and I often tell other animals onscreen when we're watching a predator story, "Be careful, this documentary isn't about you!"
no subject
Also like the weird ones about people and irl stuff. Like I watched that one on netflix a while back called "Pepsi, Where's My Jet" which was interesting.
Occasionally I will watch True Crimes ones, but I really do not like the kind of true crime documentary that doesn't offer a lot of answers. Like a mystery/true crime that doesn't offer any new evidence or a resolution, just more questions. Especially if they title it or have the tag line as something like "was Person A really murdered or was it all just a terrible accident?" and then the documentary concludes with "guess we'll never know." I hate those lol
Also I generally do not like re-enactment documentaries. I'm not even really a fan of "based on a true story" dramas. Re-enactments because they are usually poorly acted and take something away from the real story imo. The dramas I think because they have to fit all the facts in somehow which means they get too focused on "telling" the story instead of letting the story just happen naturally. If that makes sense.
And I think a good documentary is largely in the editing. But it also has to be well researched and informational.
no subject