yourlibrarian: Neil Caffrey Half Face Crop (WC-NeilHalfFaceCrop-sallymn)
yourlibrarian ([personal profile] yourlibrarian) wrote in [community profile] tv_talk2023-08-17 06:32 pm

Ted Lasso S3

I finished S3 of Ted Lasso over a month ago but found it difficult to write about. Spoilers for the season behind the cut. I can see why people weren't that enthused with it. As I discussed in comments on an earlier post in my blog, they tried to take on bigger things this season which didn't work well given the show's limitations. At the same time, other developments rather lost some of the "feel good" aspects of the show.

For one thing, I felt that Nate's storyline had an abrupt and unconvincing turn. I could understand why dark!Nate came about, but understood less how he could do a U to return to take on even less than what he had before. I felt the show was trying to tell us that had Nate felt the love and respect he felt he needed (from a girlfriend and his father) that he would have never taken his dark turn. And that once he and Jade were together and his father explained himself, that he no longer needed the sort of validation that came from the public and from a well rewarded, high profile job.

But this makes little sense given that his father called him a genius child. A genius child needs challenges and work that exercises their skills. It's quite understandable that he was never given that opportunity under Rupert's original ownership -- due to Nate's personality, his lack of connections, and probably racism.

So I could understand why Nate wouldn't want to work with Rupert anymore (and also why he went to work for him in the first place). But are there really no other opportunities in the sport for him to serve as a coach? It didn't seem that he was just taking jobs as a waiter or as an assistant equipment manager in order to do something while waiting for other job opportunities to arise.

I mean, not that much in Ted Lasso is realistic (Keeley's work life, for example), but this is a character development issue which served as a centerpoint for much of two seasons.

At the same time other stuff just seemed to be tied up with a bow in the epilogue yet a central feature of the season -- the developing relationship between Keeley, Roy and Jamie -- was left hanging. They were clearly all still friends but that seemed a cop out.

While it certainly seems possible that producers could spin the show off to follow Richmond generally (especially if we consider Trent's book title) or various characters, I think it's good that the show ended here. Unless there's a very clear idea for what to do with a connected show that doesn't change characters in order to fit an idea, I feel it's better to leave it with the ending we got.

What were the pluses and minuses of the season to you?
feurioo: (Default)

[personal profile] feurioo 2023-08-19 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for replying! I was mainly asking because, while I felt compelled to agree with you, I simultaneously had the sense that they also denied the viewer a lot that seemed to be fairly popular with audiences.

Shipping issues aside (and they seemed to actively relish in disappointing the Tedbecca fans), we didn't get as much Roy-Phoebe or practically anything much about Roy's private life. Sam didn't get his own arc after telling Rebecca last season that he would only get more wonderful -- and despite being a fan favorite. For example, I saw many fans wish for a Sam romance with Simi, the chef at Ola's. Obviously, we all wanted more Ted. The expectation that the show would stay true to its Romcommunism core when, after all, the only couples that got their happy ending were either newly established (Rebecca/Boat Guy, Jade/Nate) or widely interpreted as abusive (Beard/Jane) and, as such, none that people were already actively invested in at the start of the season.

Absolutely agree with you re: Roy, by the way. He used to be my second favorite TL character and I really disliked what they did with him in this season. He was a good support during Jamie's arc but, on his own, he seemed so hollow. While I thought that his reasons for the separation made sense, I really wanted to see him work through his issues throughout the season, not starting to do it at its end. In that context: I also wanted *so much* more Dr. Sharon.

I recently left the fandom because the characters simply don't compel me like they used to. Plus, the knowledge that the writers' room didn't care about the Michelle/Jake messiness or the Beard/Jane criticism, to begin with, simply made me aware that it was never the kind of show that I wanted it to be. Which is fine, obviously, but still a little disappointing because I did (and still do) really love the first two seasons. (You're so valid for reading Ted/Trent, by the way! There's a lot of really great stuff out there.)
Edited 2023-08-19 15:46 (UTC)
china_shop: Neal makes Peter's heart glow golden (WC - Neal/Peter yellow heart)

[personal profile] china_shop 2023-08-19 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Agreed about all the absences and insufficient Sam! They spent way too much time on new characters that they didn't even want us to care about, like Zava and Jack. (I personally was relieved Ted/Rebecca didn't happen, but I totally get that it must have felt like a kick in the teeth to shippers.)

I guess there's two kinds of fan service: one where they take fans' wishes and opinions seriously and integrate them into the story, and one where they throw in a few scenes or a minor storyline hoping to make fans squee but without any intention of following through. I'm an old school fan with low expectations of TV, so I sometimes enjoy the latter, but it's hard to make it seem organic to the characters, and there's often a cost in terms of the cohesiveness of the show.

I'm so sorry you felt betrayed/got burnt by the writers' room. That sucks so much. :-(((

(In my fandoms, I tend to avoid any behind-the-scenes, TPTB or actor info, because I much prefer to connect directly with the show on my own terms. Death of the author, and all that. But even then, yeah, when the characters change in ways that don't work for you, it's always really hard.)
feurioo: (Default)

[personal profile] feurioo 2023-08-20 07:35 am (UTC)(link)
I, too, was relieved they didn't happen. Technically, this pairing should work for me but I just never really felt that spark. I also really enjoyed the Ted/Sassy dynamic even though it was pretty obvious that those two were never endgame material.

I used to be that way with many of my shows before I joined online fandom, and yes, it made it easier to appreciate what I got. Now, if I develop a fixation, I usually do a deep dive and feel the involved parties out. There's typically a lot more love involved than disappointment. The closest I nowadays come to "Death of the Author" is by watching more obscure, older non-English language productions that rarely attract much English-speaking press or fan attention.

I'm actually not sure how I feel about fanservice in general but, I suppose, my first instinct is always one of pure delight because, at last, fandom isn't treated like a shameful secret anymore. Then again, I prefer an intact fourth wall between me and the people and minds I adore because my fannish desires do not always reflect the things I actually want to see. Plus, I don't like the feeling of being observed while I'm playing in my little sandbox.

If I may ask: Do you actively try to avoid this BTS knowledge while engaging with other fans about the shows you watch, or do you engage with them in situations and contexts where this BTS knowledge is either absent or unneeded? I genuinely find it hard to imagine fandom spaces that don't also invite discussions of all these other aspects but I'm guessing your fandom environment might already be cultivated in a way corresponding to your preferences.
china_shop: Close-up of Zhao Yunlan grinning (Default)

[personal profile] china_shop 2023-08-20 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Then again, I prefer an intact fourth wall between me and the people and minds I adore because my fannish desires do not always reflect the things I actually want to see. Plus, I don't like the feeling of being observed while I'm playing in my little sandbox.

Yes, both of these things. Plus, I really enjoy non-canon pairings -- as soon as something becomes officially canon, the probability wave collapses, and there's less space to play. (I tend to write canon setting fic, rather than AUs, so.) My current fandom is the Cdrama Guardian, which is a show based on a m/m novel. Because of censorship, the pairing isn't officially canon, but the entire story is built around them, and it's (as one person described it) a firehose of slash. I love it! :D

(I also love actual queer rep, of course! I just don't tend to get fannish about it in the writing-fic kind of way.)

Do you actively try to avoid this BTS knowledge while engaging with other fans about the shows you watch, or do you engage with them in situations and contexts where this BTS knowledge is either absent or unneeded? I genuinely find it hard to imagine fandom spaces that don't also invite discussions of all these other aspects but I'm guessing your fandom environment might already be cultivated in a way corresponding to your preferences.

Ha! Yeah, it's a weird mode of engagement in this day and age. My strategy is to stick to Dreamwidth, only follow people who don't talk about the BTS stuff on their journals (or who cut-tag, or tag consistently enough that I can filter it out), and I have a plug-in for Firefox that replaces the actor's names with a different text string, so if I see that, I start skimming or back button.

It started because I was trying to avoid falling into any more RPS pairings (my partner's squicked by RPS, and I'm someone who can't shut up about my fandoms, lol), but now I find that thinking about BTS stuff disrupts my suspension of disbelief to the point it makes it hard to watch the show in an immersive way. (I don't want to be thinking about the acting or the production; I want to be feeling the characters. If that makes sense.) I don't have this problem nearly as much with shows I'm not fannish about, though.